{"id":325255,"date":"2022-10-14T12:37:35","date_gmt":"2022-10-14T10:37:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/investinslovakia.eu\/?p=325255"},"modified":"2023-05-03T11:29:28","modified_gmt":"2023-05-03T09:29:28","slug":"preco-nestavat-ale-rekonstruovat-pripadova-studia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wordpress.investinslovakia.eu\/en\/preco-nestavat-ale-rekonstruovat-pripadova-studia\/","title":{"rendered":"Why not build, but reconstruct? A case study"},"content":{"rendered":"
As of 2019, our team has analyzed hundreds of projects. Beyond the financial calculations, it's all about intent and execution, which must make sense. For the developer, investors, future owners, and the planet. There are a number of deciding factors as to whether a development project sets itself apart from the rest and reaches investors. Which projects make sense to support and which ones are better off? We answer based on our experience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Developers encounter a number of problems when reconstructing historic buildings. However, this statement applies to the reconstruction of cultural monuments and large-scale redevelopment of original brownfields - a term often used by developers for construction in the so-called brown zone, i.e. on a site that was a built-up area before construction began. These are business of the rich and experienced<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n On the other hand, small projects can be more economically viable and faster than new construction. The developer will take advantage of the existing space and its neglected potential. The prerequisite is creativity and responsible planning - the new plan must fit in with the original spaces and surroundings. Care must be taken to be aware of possible hidden complications such as damp, ground water or construction substandard to today's standards. If the developer can avoid these threats, the renovation offers significant benefits. We break them down below in the article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n